Systematic Mapping in Mobile Learning Topics Based on Bibliometric Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70290/jeti.v1i1.6Keywords:
Bibliometric, mobile learning, m-learningAbstract
The study aims to reverse the trend in mobile learning research through bibliometric analysis by focusing on authors, publications, keywords, and countries. The data from 2011-2021. This research uses various applications that can assist bibliometric analysis, namely Publish or Perish (PoP), VosViewer, and Ms. Excel. Bibliometric analysis shows that most of the countries doing mobile learning are Malaysia, Indonesia, India, United States, Saudi Arabia, Spain, Australia, Taiwan, Turkey, and China. According to the keyword “Mobile learning’, “M-Learning”, “E-Learning”, and “Mobile Device” are the most keywords is platform, mobile application, m-learning application, mobile learning technology, multimedia, and educational process. It was found citing largest analyzed that research by Emran, Mezhuyev, and Kamaludin (2015) is 268 citation. And the last, was found the highest number of authors is shown in 3, the number of authors is 877 with percentages 88% researchers who collaborite in mobile learning research.
References
Alsswey, A., Al-Samarraie, H., 2019. M-learning adoption in the Arab gulf countries: A systematic review of factors and challenges. Education and Information Technologies, 24(5), 3163–3176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09923-1.
Asabere, N.Y., 2013. Benefits and Challenges of Mobile Learning Implementation: Story of Developing Nations. International Journal of Computer Applications, 73(1), 23–27. DOI : https://doi.org/10.5120/12706-9504.
Burns, S. M., & Lohenry, K. C. (2010). Cellular Phone Use in Class: Implications for Teaching and Learning a Pilot Study.
Chee, K.N., Yahaya, N., Ibrahim, N.H., Hasan, M.N., 2017. Review of mobile learning trends 2010–2015: A meta-analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 113–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.18326/pustabiblia.v3i1.
Duncan, D.K., Hoekstra, A.R., Wilcox, B.R., 2012. Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: Does in-class cell phone use reduce learning? Astronomy Education Review, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2012011.
Kasemodel, M.G.C., Makishi, F., Souza, R.C., Silva, V.L., 2016. Following the trail of crumbs: A bibliometric study on consumer behavior in the Food Science and Technology field. International Journal of Food Studies, 5(1), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.7455/ijfs/5.1.2016.a7.
Lee, S., Tam, C.L., Chie, Q.T., 2014. Mobile phone usage preferences: The contributing factors of personality, social anxiety and loneliness. Social Indicators Research, 118 (3), 1205–1228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0460-2.
Rohanda, Winoto, Y. (2019). Analisis bibliometrika tingkat kolaborasi, produktivitas penulis, serta profil artikel jurnal kajian informasi & perpustakaan tahun 2014- 2018. Journal of Library and Information Science, 3, 1–15.
Seliaman, M. E., & Al-Turki, M. S. (2012). Mobile Learning Adoption in Saudi Arabia. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 6(9), 1129- 1131. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1077106
Small, H., 1999. Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (9), 799–813.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 International Journal of Educational Technology and Instruction (IJETI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
